How to Reply to a Cheque Bounce Notice in India: Options, Defences and Reply Format
If you receive a cheque bounce notice under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 188, you have 15 days from receipt to act. Pay the cheque amount to end the matter, negotiate a written settlement, or send a written reply through an advocate stating your defence with documents. Ignoring the notice usually leads to a criminal complaint.
Key Takeaways
- A person who receives a cheque bounce notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has 15 days from receiving it to pay the cheque amount and avoid prosecution.
- The law does not require the drawer to reply to the notice, but a timely reply records the defence early and can support it at trial.
- Once the drawer admits signing the cheque, the court presumes under Section 139 of the NI Act that it was issued for a legally enforceable debt, and the drawer must rebut this on a balance of probabilities.
- Common defences include repayment of the debt, a security cheque given for a liability that never arose, misuse of a blank cheque, and defects in the notice itself, such as a wrong amount or late dispatch.
- A reply does not stop the payee from filing a complaint; if the debt is genuinely due, paying or settling within 15 days is usually the safest course.
- If the case is filed, the drawer can still settle at any stage under Section 147 of the NI Act, at no extra cost if payment is made before defence evidence is recorded (Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar, 2025).
Introduction
Receiving a legal notice for a bounced cheque can be alarming. It warns of a criminal case, and the deadline to respond is short.
But a notice is not a conviction. It is a demand, and how you respond in the next 15 days can decide whether the matter ends quietly, settles on fair terms, or goes to court with your defence already on record.
This guide explains what the notice means, your four options, the defences the law allows, how to write a reply with a ready-to-use format, and what happens if a complaint is filed anyway.
What Does a Cheque Bounce Notice Mean for You?
A cheque bounce notice is a formal demand from the payee to pay the bounced cheque amount within 15 days of receipt. If you do not pay, the payee can file a criminal complaint against you under Section 138.
What the law says
(a) The statute: Under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 of the NI Act, the offence is complete only if the drawer “fails to make the payment of the said amount of money” within 15 days of receiving the notice. Punishment on conviction is imprisonment up to 2 years, a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both.
(b) What courts have held: The Supreme Court has held that the offence is complete only after the 15 days pass without payment (K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan, 1999). A drawer who claims not to have received the notice can still pay within 15 days of receiving the court summons and have the complaint rejected (C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed, 2007).
(c) Practical advice: Note the date you received the notice. Count 15 days from that date. That is your window to pay, settle or reply.
The law at a glance
| Provision | What it means for you as the drawer |
| Section 138, NI Act | Offence if the cheque amount is not paid within 15 days of receiving notice |
| Section 139, NI Act | Court presumes the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt; you must rebut it |
| Section 141, NI Act | Directors and persons in charge can be prosecuted for a company’s cheque |
| Section 143A, NI Act | Court can order you to pay interim compensation of up to 20% during trial |
| Section 147, NI Act | You can settle (compound) the case at any stage |
| Section 148, NI Act | On appeal against conviction, you may have to deposit at least 20% of the fine or compensation |
| Section 415, BNSS (earlier Section 374, CrPC) | Right to appeal against conviction |
| Section 318, BNS (earlier Section 420, IPC) | Cheating; applies only if dishonest intent existed when the cheque was given |
What Are Your Options After Receiving the Notice?
You have four options: pay in full, negotiate a settlement, send a reply disputing the claim, or do nothing. Doing nothing is almost always the worst choice.
| Option | When it makes sense | What happens next |
| Pay the cheque amount within 15 days | The debt is genuine and you can pay | The matter ends; no offence under Section 138 |
| Negotiate a written settlement | The debt is genuine but you need time | Instalments or a reduced amount, recorded in writing; the payee may still file if you default |
| Send a reply disputing the claim | You have a genuine defence with documents | Your defence is on record; the payee may still file a complaint |
| Ignore the notice | Rarely advisable | The payee can file a complaint after 15 days; your silence may be noted by the court |
Paying the cheque amount
Pay by bank transfer, demand draft or a fresh cheque that you are sure will clear, and take a written acknowledgement from the payee stating that the dishonoured cheque amount has been received in full. Ask for the original dishonoured cheque to be returned.
Negotiating a settlement
Put any settlement in a signed agreement stating the total amount, the instalment dates, and that the payee will not file a complaint (or will withdraw one) once payment is complete. Courts encourage settlement, and Section 147 allows the offence to be compounded at any stage.
Ignoring the notice
There is no legal duty to reply. However, in Rangappa v. Sri Mohan (2010), the Supreme Court noted the accused’s failure to reply to the statutory notice while holding that he had not rebutted the presumption. An unexplained silence can weaken a defence you raise later.
What Defences Can You Raise in Your Reply?
Your reply should state any real defence clearly, because the court will presume the debt once you admit signing the cheque.
Defences on the merits (no legally enforceable debt)
- The debt was already paid before the cheque was presented, fully or in part. If part was paid and the cheque was presented for the full amount without recording the part payment, the Supreme Court has held that Section 138 may not apply (Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel v. Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel, 2022).
- Security cheque for a liability that never arose. A security cheque can attract Section 138 if the debt is due when it is presented, but not if no liability existed on that date (Sripati Singh v. State of Jharkhand, 2021).
- Blank cheque misused. A signed blank cheque given voluntarily still attracts the presumption (Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar, 2019), so you must show with evidence that it was filled in for an amount you did not owe.
- No transaction at all, or the payee lacked the financial capacity to lend the amount claimed. The Supreme Court accepted such a defence on the facts in Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa (2019).
- Gift or donation. A cheque given as a gift is not for a debt or liability.
- Time-barred debt. This defence depends on facts: the Supreme Court has held that a cheque issued for a time-barred debt can itself be a valid promise to pay under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (A.V. Murthy v. B.S. Nagabasavanna, 2002).
Technical defences (defects in the notice or procedure)
- Wrong amount in the notice. A notice demanding an amount different from the cheque amount is invalid (Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul, 2025).
- Notice sent after 30 days from the payee’s receipt of the return memo.
- Cheque presented after its 3-month validity.
- Joint account cheque you did not sign. Only the signatory can be prosecuted (Aparna A. Shah v. Sheth Developers, 2013).
Defences that usually fail
- “I stopped payment.” Dishonour for “payment stopped by drawer” can still attract Section 138 if a debt existed.
- “The account was closed.” Courts treat this as within Section 138.
- “The cash loan breached Income Tax rules.” In Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar (2025), the Supreme Court held that a cash loan above ₹20,000 contrary to Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act does not by itself defeat a Section 138 case.
Whether any defence succeeds depends on your documents and the facts. Raise only defences you can support with evidence.
How to Reply to a Cheque Bounce Notice: Step-by-Step
Read the notice carefully, check it for defects, gather your documents, and send a factual reply through an advocate within 15 days.
- Note the date of receipt. Keep the envelope, the postal tracking details or the email or WhatsApp timestamp.
- Check the notice for defects: cheque number, date and amount; whether the amount demanded matches the cheque exactly; the dates of presentation and dishonour; and whether it was sent within 30 days of the return memo.
- Collect your documents: bank statements, payment receipts, agreements, messages, and any written acknowledgements from the payee.
- Decide your option. If the debt is genuine, prioritise payment or settlement within the 15 days.
- Draft the reply. Deny incorrect facts, state the true facts briefly, refer to supporting documents, and point out any defect in the notice.
- Have an advocate review and sign it. Your reply will be compared with your defence at trial, so it must be accurate and consistent.
- Send the reply by registered post or speed post, and by email or WhatsApp if the notice came that way. Keep all receipts.
- Preserve evidence. Keep originals of every document safely; you will need them if a complaint is filed.
What not to write
- Admissions you do not intend to make, such as “I will pay soon” if you dispute the debt
- Facts you cannot prove
- Threats or abusive language
- A reply that contradicts documents the payee may hold
Reply to Cheque Bounce Notice Format (Sample)
Choose the paragraph that fits your defence, delete the others, and have an advocate adapt the reply to your facts.
REPLY TO LEGAL NOTICE DATED [DATE] UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
Sent by: Registered Post A.D. / Speed Post / Email
Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]
To,
[Name of the advocate who sent the notice]
[Address]
(Counsel for [name of payee])
Subject: Reply to your legal notice dated [date] regarding Cheque No. [number] dated [date] for ₹[amount]
Sir/Madam,
Under instructions from and on behalf of my client, [name of drawer], residing at [address] (hereinafter “my client”), I reply to your notice dated [date], received by my client on [date], as follows:
- That the contents of your notice are false, misleading and denied in their entirety, except what is specifically admitted below.
- That my client admits issuing Cheque No. [number] but denies that it was issued in discharge of any legally enforceable debt or liability existing on the date of its presentation.
- [Use the paragraph that applies]
(a) Debt repaid: That my client repaid the entire amount of ₹[amount] to your client on [date(s)] through [bank transfer / UPI / demand draft] (reference no. [number]), and nothing remained due when your client presented the cheque.
(b) Security cheque: That the said cheque was handed over only as security for [describe transaction], which never materialised / under which no amount became payable, and your client was not entitled to present it.
(c) Blank cheque misused: That my client had handed over a signed blank cheque to your client on [date] for [purpose], and your client has filled in an amount that was never owed and misused it.
(d) No transaction: That my client never borrowed any amount from your client, and your client has no documents to show any such loan. - [If applicable] That your notice is also legally defective, as [it demands ₹(amount) whereas the cheque is for ₹(amount) / it was sent after 30 days of your client receiving the return memo / the cheque was presented after its validity].
- That in view of the above, my client is not liable to pay the amount demanded, and no offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out.
- That your client is advised to return the said cheque to my client and refrain from initiating any proceedings, failing which my client shall defend them at your client’s risk as to costs and consequences, and reserves the right to take appropriate legal action for misuse of the cheque.
[Signature]
[Name of Advocate], Advocate
Enrolment No. [number]
[Office address, phone, email]
Note: If you intend to pay or settle, do not send a denial. Instead, reply proposing the payment or settlement terms, and record the final agreement in writing.
Worked Example: Replying to a Notice for a Security Cheque
This example shows how a drawer with a genuine defence responds within the 15 days.
Sanjay Rao, a contractor in Bengaluru, gives Deepak Nair a signed cheque for ₹5,00,000 as security for a supply contract dated 1 June 2026. The contract is cancelled on 20 June 2026 before any material is supplied. Deepak later deposits the cheque.
| Date | Event | What Sanjay does |
| 10 Sep 2026 | Deepak deposits the cheque; it bounces | Unaware |
| 25 Sep 2026 | Sanjay receives a Section 138 notice demanding ₹5,00,000 | Notes the date; 15-day window ends 10 Oct 2026 |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Collects the contract, the cancellation email of 20 June and bank statements | Prepares his evidence |
| 3 Oct 2026 | His advocate sends a reply by speed post and email, using paragraph 3(b) | Defence recorded within 15 days |
| 15 Nov 2026 | Deepak files a complaint anyway | Sanjay appears, seeks bail, and relies on his reply and documents |
Because no liability existed when the cheque was presented, Sanjay has a recognised defence (Sripati Singh, 2021). The outcome will still depend on the evidence each side produces at trial.
What Happens If a Complaint Is Filed After Your Reply?
A reply does not stop a complaint. If one is filed, you will receive a summons, and you can seek bail, settle, or contest the case.
The stages, from the drawer’s side
- Summons: The Magistrate issues summons, increasingly by electronic means after Sanjabij Tari (2025).
- Appearance and bail: The offence is bailable, so bail is usually granted on furnishing a bond.
- Interim compensation: The court may order you to pay up to 20% of the cheque amount under Section 143A. It is refundable with interest if you are acquitted.
- Settlement: You can compound the case at any stage. Under Sanjabij Tari, there is no extra cost if you pay before defence evidence is recorded; later stages attract 5%, 7.5% or 10% of the cheque amount.
- Trial: You cross-examine the complainant and lead your own evidence to rebut the presumption.
- Judgment and appeal: If convicted, you can appeal to the Sessions Court and may be asked to deposit at least 20% under Section 148.
Where the case will be heard
The complaint is filed where the payee’s bank branch is located if the cheque was deposited in the payee’s account (Section 142(2)(a), NI Act). This may be in a different city from where you live.
Costs and time
- Advocate’s fee for a reply varies by city and experience; there is no court fee for a reply.
- Defending a trial involves ongoing advocate fees and court appearances. Many contested cases take one to three years.
- Settling early is almost always the cheapest outcome if the debt is genuine.
Documents to keep ready
- The notice and the envelope or digital record showing when you received it
- A copy of your reply and proof of sending
- Bank statements and payment receipts
- Agreements, invoices, cancellation letters or emails
- Messages with the payee about the transaction or the cheque
- Identity proof and two passport-size photographs for bail
Rights of the Drawer and the Payee
Both sides have clear rights. Knowing the payee’s rights helps you judge whether to fight or settle.
Your rights as the drawer
- Pay within 15 days and avoid any case
- Reply and record your defence
- Settle at any stage under Section 147
- Get bail as a matter of right, since the offence is bailable
- Rebut the presumption under Section 139 at trial
- Appeal against conviction
The payee’s rights
- File a complaint within one month after the 15-day period ends
- Seek interim compensation of up to 20%
- File a civil recovery suit in parallel
- Prosecute a company together with its directors in charge
Common Mistakes When Replying to a Cheque Bounce Notice
Most drawers hurt their case through delay, careless admissions or inconsistent stories.
- Ignoring the notice and losing the chance to pay or settle cheaply.
- Replying after 15 days. A late reply has less value, and the complaint may already be filed.
- Admitting the debt in the reply and then denying it at trial.
- Raising a defence without documents. The burden is on you once the signature is admitted.
- Paying in cash without a receipt. Always pay through banking channels and get a written acknowledgement.
- Settling verbally. Record every settlement in a signed document.
- Not attending court after summons, which can lead to a warrant.
Key Court Rulings for Drawers
| Case | Court and year | Key holding (one line) |
| K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510 | Supreme Court, 1999 | The offence is complete only after the 15-day period expires without payment. |
| A.V. Murthy v. B.S. Nagabasavanna, (2002) 2 SCC 642 | Supreme Court, 2002 | A cheque for a time-barred debt can be a valid promise to pay under Section 25(3), Contract Act. |
| C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed, (2007) 6 SCC 555 | Supreme Court, 2007 | A drawer claiming non-receipt of notice can pay within 15 days of receiving summons. |
| Rangappa v. Sri Mohan, (2010) 11 SCC 441 | Supreme Court, 2010 | The presumption includes a legally enforceable debt but is rebuttable; failure to reply to the notice was noted against the accused. |
| Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar, (2019) 4 SCC 197 | Supreme Court, 2019 | A voluntarily given signed blank cheque attracts the presumption. |
| Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa, (2019) 5 SCC 418 | Supreme Court, 2019 | The accused can rebut the presumption on a balance of probabilities, including by questioning the payee’s financial capacity. |
| Sripati Singh v. State of Jharkhand, 2021 | Supreme Court, 2021 | A security cheque attracts Section 138 only if the debt is due on presentation. |
| Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel v. Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel, (2023) 1 SCC 578 | Supreme Court, 2022 | A cheque presented for the full amount after part payment may not attract Section 138. |
| Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul, 2025 INSC 1133 | Supreme Court, 2025 | A notice demanding an amount different from the cheque amount is invalid. |
| Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar, 2025 INSC 1158 | Supreme Court, 2025 | Cash-loan Income Tax breaches do not defeat a Section 138 case; graded compounding costs apply. |
FAQs
1. Is it mandatory to reply to a cheque bounce notice?
No. The Negotiable Instruments Act does not require the drawer to reply. However, a timely reply records your defence early, and courts have noted an accused’s silence when assessing whether the presumption of debt was rebutted, as in Rangappa v. Sri Mohan (2010). If you have a genuine defence, replying is usually wise.
2. How many days do I have to reply to a cheque bounce notice?
15 days. Clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 gives you 15 days from receiving the notice to pay the cheque amount. There is no separate deadline for a reply, but sending it within the same 15 days is advisable, because the payee can file a complaint once that period ends.
3. Can a reply stop a cheque bounce case from being filed?
No. A reply only records your side of the story. The payee can still file a complaint after the 15-day period. The only sure way to prevent a case is to pay the cheque amount within 15 days of receiving the notice, or to reach a written settlement that the payee honours.
4. What happens if I ignore a cheque bounce notice?
The payee can file a criminal complaint under Section 138 within one month after the 15 days end. You will then receive a court summons and may be ordered to pay interim compensation of up to 20% of the cheque amount. Ignoring the notice also means losing the chance to settle without a court case.
5. Can I reply to the notice myself without a lawyer?
Yes, you can send a reply in your own name. However, your reply may be compared with your defence at trial, so any admission or inconsistency can hurt you. For most people, having an advocate draft or review the reply is worth the cost, especially for large amounts.
6. What if the amount in the notice is different from the cheque amount?
The notice is likely invalid. In Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul (2025), the Supreme Court held that the notice must demand the exact cheque amount, and quashed a complaint where the notice demanded double. Point out this defect in your reply and preserve the notice as evidence.
7. I gave the cheque as security. Do I still have to pay?
It depends on whether a debt was due when the cheque was presented. In Sripati Singh v. State of Jharkhand (2021), the Supreme Court held that a security cheque attracts Section 138 if the liability had arisen by then. If no amount was ever payable, you have a defence, which you should state in your reply with documents.
8. Can I go to jail after receiving a cheque bounce notice?
Not because of the notice itself. Jail is possible only if a complaint is filed, a trial is held and you are convicted, with a maximum of 2 years. The offence is bailable, and most cases settle. Paying or settling within 15 days of the notice avoids prosecution altogether.
9. Can I settle after a cheque bounce case has been filed?
Yes. The offence is compoundable under Section 147 of the NI Act at any stage. Under the Supreme Court’s 2025 guidelines in Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar, settling before defence evidence is recorded costs nothing extra; later settlements attract 5%, 7.5% or 10% of the cheque amount.
10. What should I do if I did not receive the notice at all?
If you first learn of the case through a court summons, you can pay the cheque amount within 15 days of receiving the summons and ask the court to reject the complaint, as held in C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed (2007). You can also challenge whether the notice was properly sent to your correct address.
Conclusion
When you receive a cheque bounce notice, the 15-day window is your best opportunity. If the debt is genuine, pay or settle in writing and take a receipt. If you have a real defence, send a factual reply through an advocate within 15 days, supported by documents, and keep everything safe in case a complaint follows. Never ignore the notice or pay in cash without proof. For advice on your specific situation, consult a qualified advocate.
Disclaimer: This article and the sample reply are general legal information for awareness and are not legal advice. Each reply must be adapted to your specific facts. Laws and procedures may change. Please consult a qualified advocate before replying to a notice or taking any legal action.




